Frankenstein the true story uncut-Wild Realm Film Reviews: Frankenstein: The True Story

Here is a film I was particularly curious to revisit. I counted KING KONG and this television film as being my two favorite movies in the day and they both share the misunderstood monster character that also has always reverberated in my animal-loving heart. Whiting is a long-haired pretty boy, has a certain presence yet none of the intensity of a guy who digs up graves. Here, as in the novel, the creature continues to haunt Victor. The creature, once a worshipful student, is now a bitter son, and Victor his withholding father.

Frankenstein the true story uncut

Frankenstein the true story uncut

Director: Jack Smight. Later, the scene in which he crashes a party and beheads a key character is a Frankenstein the true story uncut horror Frankenstein the true story uncut and manages to be emotional and grotesque. He was Shelly friend Lord Byron's personal physician, confidant, and dope supplier. In other projects Wikiquote. At the time, the film was looked upon as a "television event," and it drew a host of noted actors, including John Gielgud and Agnes Moorehead. John Polidori : [ to the Creature ] I can't abide delicacy, especially in monsters. Dread Central.

Asian free tgp. Sunday, October 15, 2006

Polidori" segment is complete. Jack Smight's Frankenstein the true story uncut does not offer anything nearly so interesting as the script, but it is workman-like, and while the production rFankenstein tend to be a shade too baroque Frankenstein the true story uncut their own good one never lacks for something to look Uncensored pic on the screen. Because it is best on one of the best horror unxut ever. In Part Two Polidori invents a flawed female creature. Elizabeth Fanschawe Michael Sarrazin When Agatha and Felix return home unexpectedly one morning, they encounter the creature and react in truf. I was oh-so-pleasantly surprised when it was run on a premium cable network in while I was living in California! Peaky Blinders. Start your free trial. Instead of the usual hideous man covered in stitches, the producers decided to hire handsome leading man Michael Sarrazin for the role.

Sign in.

  • Sign in.
  • Forgot your password?
  • The film was a critical success and a ratings winner for NBC, and despite it being a much desired title for collectors over the years, only the abridged version was issued on VHS by Goodtimes licensed from Universal back in the s.

Sign in. Watch now. When college professor, Peter Proud begins experiencimg flashbacks of an earlier life, he's mysteriously drawn to a place he's never been to, but which seems familiar. He soon finds his Scientist Victor Frankenstein builds a man from spare body parts; the monster comes alive and wreaks havoc.

When Ygor brings the Monster to Dr. Ludwig Frankenstein for care, Ludwig gets the idea of replacing the Monster's current criminal brain with a normal one. An evil scientist and his hunchbacked assistant escape from prison and encounter Dracula, the Wolf Man and Frankenstein's Monster.

One of the sons of Frankenstein finds his father's monster in a coma and revives him, only to find out he is controlled by Ygor who is bent on revenge. After years of research, the doctor finally succeeds in creating the perfect woman, who gets the name "Eva". A gang of young people call themselves the Living Dead. They terrorize the population from their small town. After an agreement with the devil, if they kill themselves firmly believing in When an injured wife murderer takes refuge on a remote Lancashire farm, the owners three children mistakenly believe him to be the Second Coming of Christ.

Victor von Frankenstein Patrick Bergin creates his creature Randy Quaid , who escapes into the countryside to find that humanity has only pain and sorrow for him. But a psychic link After being reanimated, Baron Frankenstein transfers the soul of a murdered young man into the body of a woman, prompting her to kill.

When the brilliant but unorthodox scientist Dr. Victor Frankenstein rejects the artificial man that he has created, the Creature escapes and later swears revenge. This is my favorite version of the Frankenstein stories and I have seen them all. I remember sitting up late to watch this movie in the 's. I have the very edited version on VHS. I would love to see the entire film released on DVD.

The all star cast and period costumes were excellent! Explore popular and recently added TV series available to stream now with Prime Video. Start your free trial. Find showtimes, watch trailers, browse photos, track your Watchlist and rate your favorite movies and TV shows on your phone or tablet! Keep track of everything you watch; tell your friends. Full Cast and Crew.

Release Dates. Official Sites. Company Credits. Technical Specs. Plot Summary. Plot Keywords. Parents Guide. External Sites. User Reviews. User Ratings. External Reviews. Metacritic Reviews. Photo Gallery. Trailers and Videos. Crazy Credits. Alternate Versions. Rate This.

Director: Jack Smight. Available on Amazon. Added to Watchlist. Best in strange. Gotyckie horrory. Use the HTML below. You must be a registered user to use the IMDb rating plugin. The Reincarnation of Peter Proud Horror Mystery. The Horror of Frankenstein Drama Horror Sci-Fi. Frankenstein and the Monster from Hell Horror Sci-Fi.

Baron Frankenstein works with a mental patient to reanimate the dead. The Ghost of Frankenstein House of Frankenstein Carrol Naish. Son of Frankenstein Naked Massacre Drama Thriller.

The Bride Fantasy Horror Romance. The Death Wheelers Adventure Horror. Whistle Down the Wind Crime Drama. Frankenstein TV Movie Frankenstein Created Woman Edit Cast Cast overview, first billed only: James Mason John Polidori Leonard Whiting Victor Frankenstein David McCallum Henri Clerval Jane Seymour Elizabeth Fanschawe Michael Sarrazin The Creature Michael Wilding Blair Margaret Leighton Francoise DuVal Ralph Richardson Lacey John Gielgud Chief Constable Tom Baker Sea Captain Julian Barnes Young Man Arnold Diamond Edit Storyline When the brilliant but unorthodox scientist Dr.

Edit Details Country: UK. Language: English. Runtime: min min theartrical release. Sound Mix: Mono. Color: Color Technicolor. Edit Did You Know? Trivia Andrew Sinclair had a similar project, "Byron's Evil", which ran out of funding when this movie went into production. Goofs When Frankenstein dissolves the severed arm with acid, the arm as first shown at the beginning of the scene is significantly different in appearance than the one which is shown actually being dissolved.

Quotes Dr. John Polidori : [ to the Creature ] I can't abide delicacy, especially in monsters. Alternate Versions The original miniseries presentation featured a prologue with James Mason visiting the grave of Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley. Soundtracks Mazurka No.

This particular one put on a personal side and a new twist to it not previously seen. It was directed by Jack Smight , and the screenplay was written by novelist Christopher Isherwood and his longtime partner Don Bachardy. I really think this movie was great, and i haven't seen it since i was a child on TV. Want to see. A fine cast, including Leonard Whiting, Nicola Padgett and guest appearances from many others, rounds out the experience. Only for completists.

Frankenstein the true story uncut

Frankenstein the true story uncut. Navigation menu

Opposed to and afraid of electricity, Polidori uses a chemical technique to animate the female which Frankenstein has sewn together, resulting in a beauty christened Prima Jane Seymour. Polidori charms his way into the Frankenstein family estate while Victor and Elizabeth are on honeymoon, passing off Prima as his ward. The script by Christopher Isherwood and Don Bachardy takes many liberties with the original novel, but injects the film with some wonderfully radical ideas and some very tender moments between the characters, including Frankenstein proclaiming to his newly born creation that he will take the place of his dearly departed brother.

The relationship between creator and creation is what binds the lengthy telefilm together, with the creature learning about love, hate, beauty, and ugliness while the narcissistic Frankenstein grows increasingly repulsed and withdrawn by what he originally saw as a reflection of himself fall apart before his eyes.

The mono audio track is absolutely fine, and optional English subtitles are included. George R. Subscribe for online training and pass PW braindumps exam on first attempt guaranteed. He ages -- and quickly. And as he ages his features collapse and seem to rot, so that he shortly begins to look like Dorian Gray's portrait. Another allegory there, which we needn't go into. The creature, discovering that he's turned ugly and feeling bitter, begins to brood, and Frankenstein locks him up and begins to pursue his plans with Elizabeth again.

The creature gets out and visits Frankenstein and Elizabeth at a fancy ball. He turns out to be one of those rowdy guests you find at every party -- smashing mirrors, windows, and furniture, and killing a few guests.

Somewhere around here, Part One ended and Part Two began. Part Two was a mistake. Instead, enter Dr. Polidori James Mason , no relation to the Polidori who shared that weekend with Shelley and the rest.

Polidori informs Frankenstein that the BEST way to bring a fabricated body to life is by using chemicals, not electrical energy, and for a moment we expect them to begin arguing like two yentas over the back fence discussing a recipe.

At any rate, Polidori enlists Frankenstein's help in creating a female body -- this time using HIS methods. She turns out to be Jane Seymour, which is a considerable improvement over Michael Sarazzin if you ask me, even though we don't get to see her wearing three or four bandages.

There's a problem, however. If Frankenstein's monster was flawed in that it aged too quickly, Polidori's creature whom Polidori names "Prima" turns out to be thoroughly cuckoo. She strangles a cat for no reason. Seymour too interrupts a fancy ball, doing a charming, impromptu pas de seul. Who wouldn't?

What a dirty trick. They all wind up dead in the arctic. That includes Frankenstein's creature, although he's described as having an "iron body" impervious to cold and is shown to be immune to bullets too. But I guess he not only doesn't age well.

He doesn't travel well either. The acting's not bad and the production values are good for TV. There are many cameos -- Gielgud, Wilding, Moorehead, Richardson, and others -- but the parts aren't substantial. It didn't really matter that the story didn't follow Mary Shelley's original very closely, although many of the issues it raised science vs. In Part One Frankenstein invents a flawed male creature. In Part Two Polidori invents a flawed female creature. Not a badly done movie, though.

It's not trashy and it's not insulting. It's just without much significance. Worth seeing once. Christopher Isherwood is a highly respected writer, but someone should have stopped him from this flaccid reverie only partially based on Mary Shelley's story. During the course of the 3-hour version of this TV movie, you can catch the author making heavy-handed references to "Pygmalion," "Dr.

Jekyll and Mr. Perhaps the whole thing might have gone better with another director. I've never seen a Jack Smight movie without feeling that he's somehow fumbled it, slack rhythms and the camera often in the wrong place. This too feels like a misfire. Pyrotechnics and lava lamp effects notwithstanding, the great set pieces are uniformly feeble. It's like he doesn't shoot the story, but shoots around it. Smight certainly gets bad performances out of well-remembered actors. James Mason is helplessly inadequate trying to convey the emotion of terror.

The first meeting of Frankenstein and his monster plays like a pickup. The character of Dr. Polidori is openly contemptuous of "mere" women, and it is he, not the monster, who disrupts Victor's wedding night.

Generally women come off very badly, the older ones caricatures of old bags, and the younger ones annoying, even nightmarish, in their sexual demands. Despite the starriness of the supporting cast, this film is merely a curiosity. Unfortunately, Mel Brooks actually gets closer to Mary Shelley's vision than this film does.

Only for completists. This is a great movie. It has to be one of the best horror movies ever. Because it is best on one of the best horror books ever. The version is better. The original Frankenstein is really a silent movie from It not a very good movie. So really this is a great deal better then the original Frankenstein. I have read book.

This is better. It is very scary. If this movie does not scary you then no movie will. This movie has a great story line. This movie also has great acting.

This movie also has great special effects. It a very well made movie. It is a must see. It is very intense. It is a great movie. James Mason and Leonard Whiting did superb jobs in portraying their parts and this story of Frankenstein. Frankenstein has been around since long before I was a kid, but its always been a thriller to watch. This particular one put on a personal side and a new twist to it not previously seen.

Although much of it is repetitious to other movies about Frankenstein, it is worth watching. MartinHafer 9 January This version of Frankenstein was shown on television in two parts back in In addition, it shows various clips of the movie that tend to ruin the film to a degree.

My advice is skip this and go right to the film. However, while much closer, a lot of additional material was added and by the two hour mark, it really deviates into a strange direction indeed.

The biggest difference the original tale and films have is that the films always spend a lot of time on how the Doctor created his monster--whereas in the book, there's very little about this. Instead, the book emphasizes the lack of responsibility the creator plays towards his creation--the true purpose of the novel. And, fortunately, this movie does focus on this quite a bit As for the "monster", an interesting choice was made for this film.

Instead of the usual hideous man covered in stitches, the producers decided to hire handsome leading man Michael Sarrazin for the role. Initially, he is a very handsome creation--receiving the admiration of others. However, in a very interesting twist, the creation begins to decompose and morph slowly--and then becomes the hideous creature.

I liked this approach--as it was very novel and offered something different. In other words, the creation becoming a monster was the result of his being rejected by his creator--not just because he was ugly--though the rejection was not as complete here as in the book. On his own, the monster is befriended by a blind guy Ralph Richardson and this ends in the tragic deaths of his family.

For some odd reason, the monster wants the now dead daughter of Richardson Jan Seymour to be brought back to life. But, for an even odder reason, instead of taking him to Frankenstein, he brings him to Mason who has been wanting to make his own undead freak. This portion of the film is as far removed from the original story as you can get and the film only gets back to the original story after the whole "Dr.

Polidori" segment is complete. It turns out that Mason was an evil mad scientist unlike Frankenstein who was just a misguided and irresponsible mad scientist , as he decided to use Sarrazin for his own end--to force Frankenstein to help him make another, and hopefully better, creation using the body of Seymour among others. After the newest creation comes to life, there is an extended portion of the film involving Seymour--who is a bit of a conniving nympho and nutter!

Now, following an attempt by Polidori and Frankenstein to murder the creature, it's no wonder that Sarrazin's character goes insane and starts to do bad things!! How this ends comes as a rather nasty surprise, that's for sure! But, as I said before, none of this bears any resemblance to the original novel and it all seems a bit histrionic.

Now, after two and a half hours, the film finally returns to the book's plot--consisting of a drawn-out portion where the creation goes about destroying the life of his creator.

Ultimately, it takes the film to the Arctic for a final showdown--something few movies ever bothered to do, but which was an important part of Shelley's story. Overall, it was a very enjoyable and lavish film. Unfortunately, it also was NOT the "true story" it purported itself to be, as at times it bore little semblance to Shelley's novel.

Interestingly, was a banner year for made for TV Frankenstein films in addition to the freaky Andy Warhol version. I say that you should see them both, though, as they are both very well made in their own way. By the way, there were a few goofy moments in the film despite it being a pretty good movie.

First, watching human limbs retain 'memories' and have the ability to crawl about independently was pretty stupid. It may have looked neat, but just made me groan. Second, the hypnosis scene with James Mason and Agnes Moorehead was also pretty silly--no one can hypnotize anyone like this!

Third, while Michael Sarrazin's creature was not too pretty later in the film, he was not THAT ugly and people's reactions to him seemed pretty absurd. I especially laughed when Agnes Moorehead saw him and had a fit and died!!! Talk about silly! And the lightning bolt turning Polidori into an instant skeleton! I was so pleased and surprised when I saw the DVD of this film for rent recently.

I originally saw it on TV back in '73 I was about 8 and it has stayed with haunted? A number of people have posted about how it made such an impression on them at the time, and I am certainly in that camp. While not a direct interpretation of the novel, it is certainly among the top three film versions of the story. It's not what you would call action packed but surprisingly, clocking in at around 3 hours, doesn't drag either, due to a tight script.

Guess it wasn't in the budget. In this release there was a very crucial scene which didn't match my memory, and I've come to find out that it had been edited. It was a somewhat gory scene but for crying out loud, it was on TV in '73!

And we couldn't put it on the DVD now?? I don't get it. Other than those couple of points, it really is a somewhat forgotten classic. I first saw this as a two-part miniseries on TV in the early seventies.

Several scenes left a strong impression on me see below. When the DVD version recently became available, I bought it on the first available day. Of course, it did not live up to my childhood memories but I was not disappointed. However, my wife found it boring too slow and a friend thought it was stupid with bad production moments and some silly dialogue.

I agree that it is slow and that there are many portions that could have been edited down. But I still find it very worthwhile particularly for the storyline interpretations and the character issues raised. Being familiar with the novel, I realize that this version is not "true" to the original story's plot.

The creature is sympathetic while still doing horrific things. Frankenstein's behavior is difficult to understand: obsessive yet easily frustrated. The good: the acting, the creature's makeup, the ending, the script in general "Bravo, Victor". My favorite scenes: the severed arm banging on the cabinet during the creation, the creature's heartbreaking realization that he is no longer beautiful, Victor and the creature on the white cliffs, the creature and the blind hermit, Prima playing the piano and playing with the white cat, the horrific ballroom scene, the final Polidori scene despite the weak special effects , the frozen deck, and the final conciliation between Frankenstein and the creature.

The interesting: why is Prima evil while the Creature starts out good? Is it Polidori's training? Can either of them be considered good or evil or are they amoral? Why does Victor treat the creature poorly? Frustration over his own failure? Why is the creature never given a name? In summary, not great but a welcome mental break from the high-action low-thought films of today.

There is a scene where Jane Seymour is wearing a black necklace, and someone pulls it off her neck, and her head falls off! I just want to know is this true or not? I know that she was wearing a black necklace, I really need to know if her head falls off when the necklace comes off.

I really think this movie was great, and i haven't seen it since i was a child on TV. I really would like to know who else seen this on TV as well. It was so overwhelming to me. Any feedback will be helpful. AlsExGal 27 October It's a very well done movie, but it is nowhere near Shelley's novel. Left to his own designs the creature truly becomes a monster over time from rejection by human beings and his creator.

This film is not about the power of the soul at all. Instead, the two lessons seem to be 1. If you are collaborating with somebody who dies suddenly while writing in his scientific notebook mid sentence, make VERY SURE you just don't finish his sentences for him and take bold steps because of those assumptions.

Forget that soul business. The important thing is to be a handsome devil of a creation! Michael Sarrazin. And he works with acid and he is always wearing this mysterious glove.

Before Michael Jackson made that fashionable. Michael Sarrazin was not just a pretty face - here he is very poignant as the creature. Jane Seymour at 22 shows just what a beautiful woman she was in her youth - perfection. Well, done with a star studded cast of old Hollywood, especially in the supporting roles, I'd say it's worth seeking out especially if you can find the original version that was shown over two nights in two hour segments each, but that was with commercials.

It really was a special presentation in spite of the lack of truth in advertising. Cineanalyst 25 August Although it doesn't fully lock in particularly well on any one theme or reworking of Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein," a few intriguing concepts, re-imaginings and borrowings from other horror films bounce around throughout, that the creature that is the movie ultimately has some life to it.

It begins like a bad recap to a prior TV episode, as well as announcing its first of many departures from the book, with Victor Frankenstein narrating the apparently-past scene of the death of his younger brother, William. The other doctor is John Polidori, the name of the author of "The Vampyre" and one of the guests at Lord Byron's villa near Lake Geneva where Mary conceived the Frankenstein story, but in this movie, he's a deformed practitioner of hypnosis and a cross between Dr.

Pretorius, of "Bride of Frankenstein" , and Dr. Fu Manchu. Meanwhile, Frankenstein's creature is an Adonis, at first, but transforms into a dark and slightly-Neanderthal-looking version of Mr. Hyde, but he remains clearly human in appearance, which makes the adverse reactions of the blind man's fellow cabin dwellers to his hideousness rather unbelievable. Otherwise, the monster follows in the footsteps of Boris Karloff by being an inarticulate childlike figure who loves music, as opposed to Shelley's philosophical creation.

As aforementioned, Elizabeth is a distasteful character this outing, Bible thumping and becoming hysterical at the sight of anything reanimated, including a ridiculous scene involving a butterfly brought back to life. A sexist treatment of Shelley's story isn't necessarily an inappropriate tract, though. The novel, after all, concerns a mother-less creation and largely relegates its female characters to the sidelines. This adaptation takes that further, including by removing Victor's mother all together and portraying its women as either or a combination of being cruel or vapid.

Written by a homosexual couple, the movie also follows somewhat in the spirit of "Bride of Frankenstein" with hints of gay romantic affections between the men, of Victor's relationship with the other two doctors and, especially, with his Adonis.

I haven't seen another Frankenstein adaptation and I've seen near 50 by now explore this angle so thoroughly since the earliest Frankenstein film, a short by the Edison Company in Scenes with mirrors become prominent after Frankenstein's creature is born.

Along with the two actors similar good looks, including their anachronistic s shaggy hairstyles, the use of mirrors reflect that the creature is Victor's double--his mirror image.

That both creatures mirror the actions of their same-gendered counterparts also reflects this. When the monster turns ugly, Victor appropriately takes his frustrations out on mirrors by smashing them. There are also a few shots where otherwise out-of-frame characters are seen via their reflections, and there's a blunt metaphor where Clerval is figuratively getting a big head as he holds a mirror that literally distorts his head's reflection to gigantic proportions.

Appearing on the boob tube during the Oil Embargo, the first employs the alternative energy of solar power and, fittingly, uses a series of mirrors to reflect the sun. The second is a kind of elaboration on the Hammer Frankenstein films, with a chemical bath, but involving lava-lamp-like, multi-color bubble animations and pyrotechnics.

The Terror Trap: Frankenstein: The True Story

Sign in. Find showtimes, watch trailers, browse photos, track your Watchlist and rate your favorite movies and TV shows on your phone or tablet! Hide Spoilers. If you thought you'd seen it all I remember seeing the original broadcast of this two-part miniseries back in '73, and how impressed I was by the cast and the writing. Witty, literate, touching and horrifying by turns, it definitely set a pretty high standard for itself just by the title alone, yet then proceeded to exceed that standard, which is something that few movies ever do, let alone those made for television.

And the performances Polidori affectionately known now and forever as "Polly-dolly. I won't spoil the shock and surprise involved with her character and Sarrazin's, but needless to say that was ONE scene that made quite an impression on my young mind, and for those who remember, you know EXACTLY which part I'm referring to!

It may not exist in its original form, as previous reviewers have pointed out, but one can only hope for a newly restored and uncut DVD version of this classic TV gem.

Now here's hoping we'll get the opportunity to see it again, as it was intended. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. I first saw this film on television at age 12 or 13, in black-and-white we didn't have a color television at the time. I recall it being shown in two parts, but even in black and white and at a young age I could see it was a rather lavish production. The cast is excellent. I found the entire story fascinating and I was mesmerized by it. I was oh-so-pleasantly surprised when it was run on a premium cable network in while I was living in California!

JoeKarlosi 1 October A two part television movie which claimed to tell, for the first time anywhere, the genuinely faithful tale of the man who made a creature, exactly as its writer, teenaged Mary Shelley, first concocted it. In this version, young Victor Frankenstein Leonard Whiting is a medical student thirsting for knowledge, which he gets from the wildly eccentric Dr.

Henry Clerval David McCallum. Clerval has devised a method of restoring dead insects back to life, and his greatest achievement comes when he reanimates a man's severed arm. Frankenstein teams up with Clerval and they are just about to proceed with the ultimate experiment of assembling a complete man from dead bodies and making it live, when Henry dies and Victor is forced to work alone I'll bet you never knew it wasn't all Frankenstein's idea.

The final product is a perfectly attractive male creation Michael Sarrazin who has been given Clerval's brain and instantly bonds with Victor, his creator. Unbeknownst to Victor, before Clerval died he tried to warn Frankenstein that the animation process performed on the first severed arm was actually reversing itself and the flesh was deteriorating. In a short period of time, the once-handsome creature begins to show signs of his skin rotting and upon witnessing this, Frankenstein suddenly loses all interest in his creation and abandons him.

The rest of the film carries on with the scorned monster's journey to punish his master. He meets up with a nasty and cunning former associate of Clerval, the elder Dr. This is a lush and well-crafted Victorian period piece, and the story of unrequited love between the creature and his creator is at the core of it. For those who up till now have only been familiar with the classic Boris Karloff image of the flat-headed monster with big boots and bolts in his neck, this is something else entirely.

It's touching but also horrifying at times, with a good cast. In addition to Michael Sarrazin's sympathetic work as the creature, David McCallum's obsessive Clerval and James Mason's unscrupulous Polidori presumably the Ernest Thesiger character in this one are the best performances. Star-studded, literate adaptation vitoruss 14 September It's a shame that this spectacular TV movie which originally ran in two 2-hour parts is only available in a much abbreviated 2 hour version actually this is the version released in theatres in the UK and abroad, while the full version played on US TV from the cheapie distributor Goodtimes.

Written by Christopher Isherwood, this literate, beautifully filmed retelling of the Mary Shelley classic is a must see. Beware the Hyper edited version!!! I saw this movie when it was originally aired on TV in It was aired in two parts, each night 2 hours long. I think it was the later Anyway I loved it. Even though this film was made by Universal, it is a different kind of film from s the Karloff incarnation.

Anyway I was delighted to see it available on video and snatched it right up. It was a 2 hour edited version that was shown theatrically in Europe back in the early s. AVOID this version! If you have only seen this edited version, you don't know what your missing. Unlike a lot of what today we call "mini series'" Frankenstein the True story really moves and the story is not padded. The screenplay by Christopher Isherwood is much better than the usual mini series. In fact watching it edited, it seemed just plain choppy.

The full version significantly adds to the audiences' understanding of the monster's actions and reactions to his maker and the female creation Prima.

Possible spoiler: Jane Seymour plays Prima as part of a dual role. She is very good in this film. I have been a fan of hers ever since. You'll swear Prima has real evil in her eyes. Also in a small part is the fourth Dr. Who, Tom Baker as a Ship captain. If you liked the edited version, finding the full version if its even commercially available will be well worth the search. Elsbed 9 January Although this film may digress in many ways from the book, it is nonetheless superb.

A fine cast, including Leonard Whiting, Nicola Padgett and guest appearances from many others, rounds out the experience. One empathizes with the monster, who begins his new life as a beautiful, sensitive creature only to physically and aesthetically deteriorate as time goes on.

An interesting twist is the subplot of Prima, the second creature, created by Dr. Polidori Victor's nemesis with the assistance of Victor I first saw this movie on television when I was about 9 or 10, I seem to remember it being shown in two parts, the second part beginning with Polidori's attempt to bring Prima into elite society, followed with the downfall of Victor, the monster and Polidori.

Really one of my favorite re-tellings of the Frankenstein story. Simply stated, the film has a highly disconcerting and surprisingly overt homo-erotic edge. Lest any one miss the implications, the creature is played by none other than Michael Sarrazin, and while many men may be described as handsome, Sarrazin is among the few who can be justly described as beautiful. He arises from the laboratory table barely decent in a few strategically placed bandages, and when his facial covering is pulled aside by the eager Dr.

Frankenstein we are treated to a lingering image of glossy black hair, pale complexion, remarkably liquid eyes, and lips that would make Vogue model weep with envy. Frankenstein takes him to his own apartment, where he educates this child-like innocent and very generously allows the creature to sleep in his own bed. Due to some unknown error in the creation process, the creature begins to deteriorate in appearance--and instead of continuing to treat him kindly, Frankenstein keeps the creature locked up, becomes verbally abusive to him, and no longer allows the creature to sleep in his bed, relegating him to a cramped mattress on the floor.

At the same time, Frankenstein is approached by the mysterious Dr. Polidori the legendary James Mason , an oily scientist with a flair for hypnosis who claims to know what went wrong. Polidori insists that they abandon the creature and create a new one: a woman, and when this new creation emerges from an entirely different process she too is remarkably beautiful; indeed, she is none other than Jane Seymour. Sexuality in general and homosexuality in particular forms a theme in many of Isherwood's works, so it would seem reasonable to assume that he was responsible for the homo-erotic elements of the film.

Jack Smight's direction does not offer anything nearly so interesting as the script, but it is workman-like, and while the production values tend to be a shade too baroque for their own good one never lacks for something to look at on the screen. The cast is also quite good. At the time, the film was looked upon as a "television event," and it drew a host of noted actors, including John Gielgud and Agnes Moorehead. No one would accuse Leonard Whiting of being a great screen talent, but he acquits himself very well; so too does David McCallum, Nicola Pagett, and the always memorable James Mason.

In terms of the DVD itself, the film quality is considerably better than the rare late-night showings I've occasionally seen on television, but I would not describe it as pristine, and I found I frequently had to bump up the volume on the soundtrack. But if you are open to the sexually subversive, which is particularly unexpected in a made-for-television film from , you couldn't make a better choice.

GFT, Amazon Reviewer. I rented this movie the other night. I was impressed by how many well known actors were in it. The acting was very good. Leonard Whiting was very convincing and seemed to really share a bond with his monster. The monster didn't seem to be all that evil until people started being mean to it.

I think the movie tried to show us that beauty is only skin deep. Jane Seymour was excellent. I recommend this movie highly, it is very well done. This is my favorite version of the Frankenstein stories and I have seen them all. I remember sitting up late to watch this movie in the 's. I have the very edited version on VHS. I would love to see the entire film released on DVD. The all star cast and period costumes were excellent!

Though it is not a literal translation of the story, it captures the philosophical nature, melancholy mood and epic scope of Mrs. Shelly's novel better than any other celluloid rendition. While keeping the bare bones no pun intended of the novel's plot, it dances all around the original story, pulling off plot elements here and there, then sticking them back on elsewhere.

For instance, Henri, in the original merely Victor Frankenstein's concerned best friend, is transformed into a mad doctor who gives Victor the monster-making knowledge. The Dr.

Frankenstein the true story uncut